Sexual Assault Allegation Against President Donald Trump | All In | MSNBC

Sharing is caring!

Save at TRELEGY.com >>> TONIGHT WE FIND OURSELVES Save at TRELEGY.com >>> TONIGHT WE FIND OURSELVES ONCE AGAIN IN THE POSITION OF ONCE AGAIN IN THE POSITION OF HAVING TO WARN YOU ABOUT THE HAVING TO WARN YOU ABOUT THE GRAPHIC NATURE OF A STORY GRAPHIC NATURE OF A STORY CONCERNING A MAN THAT WE HAVE CONCERNING A MAN THAT WE HAVE MADE OUR PRESIDENT. MADE OUR PRESIDENT. THAT IS BECAUSE IN THE PAGES OF THAT IS BECAUSE IN THE PAGES OF “NEW YORK” MAGAZINE TODAY A “NEW YORK” MAGAZINE TODAY A WELL-KNOWN WRITER HAS ACCUSED WELL-KNOWN WRITER HAS ACCUSED DONALD TRUMP OF RAPING HER.

DONALD TRUMP OF RAPING HER. IN A COVER STORY FACING AN IN A COVER STORY FACING AN EXCERPT FROM HER FORTHCOMING EXCERPT FROM HER FORTHCOMING BOOK, E. JEAN CARROLL SAYS AFTER BOOK, E. JEAN CARROLL SAYS AFTER A JOKING EXCHANGE WITH TRUMP IN A JOKING EXCHANGE WITH TRUMP IN THE BERGDORF GOODMAN DEPARTMENT THE BERGDORF GOODMAN DEPARTMENT STORE, HE ASSAULTED HER IN A STORE, HE ASSAULTED HER IN A DRESSING ROOM. DRESSING ROOM. SHE DESCRIBES IT IN DETAIL. SHE DESCRIBES IT IN DETAIL. THE NEXT MOMENT STILL WEARING THE NEXT MOMENT STILL WEARING CORRECT BUSINESS ATTIRE, SHIRT, CORRECT BUSINESS ATTIRE, SHIRT, TIE, SUIT JACKET, OVERSOCIETY, TIE, SUIT JACKET, OVERSOCIETY, HE OPENS THE OVERSOCIETY, UNZIPS HE OPENS THE OVERSOCIETY, UNZIPS HIS PANTS AND FORCING HIS HIS PANTS AND FORCING HIS FINGERS AROUND MY PRIVATE AREA FINGERS AROUND MY PRIVATE AREA THRUSTS HIS PENIS INSIDE ME. THRUSTS HIS PENIS INSIDE ME.

I’M WEARING A PAIR OF STURDY I’M WEARING A PAIR OF STURDY BLACK PATENT 4-INCH HIGH HEELS BLACK PATENT 4-INCH HIGH HEELS AND I TRY TO STOMP HIS FOOT. AND I TRY TO STOMP HIS FOOT. I TRY TO PUSH HIM OFF ME WITH I TRY TO PUSH HIM OFF ME WITH ONE FREE HAND. ONE FREE HAND. FOR SOME REASON I KEEP HOLDING FOR SOME REASON I KEEP HOLDING MY PURSE WITH THE OTHER AND I MY PURSE WITH THE OTHER AND I PUSH HIM OFF AND I OPEN THE DOOR PUSH HIM OFF AND I OPEN THE DOOR AND RUN OUT OF THE DRESSING AND RUN OUT OF THE DRESSING ROOM. ROOM. CARROLL SPOKE WITH ANNE CARROLL SPOKE WITH ANNE THOMPSON. THOMPSON. >> I HAD A RUN-IN WITH THE >> I HAD A RUN-IN WITH THE PRESIDENT IN A DRESSING ROOM IN PRESIDENT IN A DRESSING ROOM IN BERGDORF’S.

BERGDORF’S. I FOUGHT. I FOUGHT. IT WAS SHOCKING. IT WAS SHOCKING. IT WAS AGAINST MY WILL. IT WAS AGAINST MY WILL. THE MINUTE HE CLOSED THE DOOR, THE MINUTE HE CLOSED THE DOOR, BOOM. BOOM. HE THREW ME UP AGAINST THE WALL HE THREW ME UP AGAINST THE WALL AND TRIED TO KISS ME. AND TRIED TO KISS ME. IT WAS SO SHOCKING TO ME.

IT WAS SO SHOCKING TO ME. >> PRESIDENT TRUMP RELEASED A >> PRESIDENT TRUMP RELEASED A STATEMENT READING IN PART I’VE STATEMENT READING IN PART I’VE NEVER MET THIS PERSON IN MY NEVER MET THIS PERSON IN MY LIFE. LIFE. SHE IS TRYING TO SELL A BOOK, SHE IS TRYING TO SELL A BOOK, THAT SHOULD INDICATE HER THAT SHOULD INDICATE HER MOTIVATION, IT NEVER HAPPENED. MOTIVATION, IT NEVER HAPPENED. HERE IS A PHOTO OF THEM MEETING, HERE IS A PHOTO OF THEM MEETING, IT IS IN THE STORY SHE IS IT IS IN THE STORY SHE IS REFERENCING.

REFERENCING. IT SHOWS TRUMP AND CARROLL AND IT SHOWS TRUMP AND CARROLL AND THEIR SPOUSES AT A PARTY IN THEIR SPOUSES AT A PARTY IN 1987. 1987. EARLIER TODAY A SENIOR WHITE EARLIER TODAY A SENIOR WHITE HOUSE OFFICIAL OFFERED A HOUSE OFFICIAL OFFERED A STATEMENT CALLING THE ACCOUNT STATEMENT CALLING THE ACCOUNT COMPLETELY FALSE AND COMPLETELY FALSE AND UNREALISTIC, ALTHOUGH ONE HAS TO UNREALISTIC, ALTHOUGH ONE HAS TO NOTE UNREALISTIC IS AN NOTE UNREALISTIC IS AN INTERESTING CHOICE OF WORDS INTERESTING CHOICE OF WORDS CONSIDERING THE BEHAVIOR CONSIDERING THE BEHAVIOR DESCRIBED IN THE STORY IS DESCRIBED IN THE STORY IS REMARKABLY SIMILAR TO WHAT TRUMP REMARKABLY SIMILAR TO WHAT TRUMP HIMSELF HAS BRAGGED ABOUT. HIMSELF HAS BRAGGED ABOUT. AS NOTED BY CARROLL, TRUMP HAS AS NOTED BY CARROLL, TRUMP HAS ALSO DENIED ACCUSATIONS OF ALSO DENIED ACCUSATIONS OF SEXUAL MISCONDUCT BY 15 OTHER SEXUAL MISCONDUCT BY 15 OTHER WOMEN. WOMEN. AFTER THE INCIDENT AT BERGDORF AFTER THE INCIDENT AT BERGDORF GOODMAN CARROLL TOLD TWO FRIENDS GOODMAN CARROLL TOLD TWO FRIENDS AT THE TIME.

AT THE TIME. “NEW YORK” MAGAZINE VERIFIED “NEW YORK” MAGAZINE VERIFIED THAT. THAT. A FRIEND OF CARROLL’S CONFIRMED A FRIEND OF CARROLL’S CONFIRMED THAT CARROLL TOLD HER ABOUT THE THAT CARROLL TOLD HER ABOUT THE ALLEGED ATTACK THE NEXT DAY. ALLEGED ATTACK THE NEXT DAY. ACCORDING TO CARROLL, ONE OF ACCORDING TO CARROLL, ONE OF THOSE FRIENDS, QUOTE, SAID HE THOSE FRIENDS, QUOTE, SAID HE RAPED YOU. RAPED YOU. HE RAPED YOU. HE RAPED YOU. GO TO THE POLICE, I’LL GO WITH GO TO THE POLICE, I’LL GO WITH YOU, WE’LL GO TOGETHER. YOU, WE’LL GO TOGETHER. THE OTHER FRIEND SAID TELL NO THE OTHER FRIEND SAID TELL NO ONE, FORGET IT.

ONE, FORGET IT. HE HAS 200 LAWYERS, HE’LL BURY HE HAS 200 LAWYERS, HE’LL BURY YOU. YOU. TONIGHT E. JEAN CARROLL WILL TONIGHT E. JEAN CARROLL WILL JOIN LAWRENCE O’DONNELL AT JOIN LAWRENCE O’DONNELL AT P.M. P.M. JOINING ME NOW MAYA WILEY. JOINING ME NOW MAYA WILEY. IT’S A REMARKABLE THING TO READ. IT’S A REMARKABLE THING TO READ. >> OH, IT’S DISTURBING ON SO >> OH, IT’S DISTURBING ON SO MANY LEVELS. MANY LEVELS. AND THE WAY SHE WRITES ABOUT IT AND THE WAY SHE WRITES ABOUT IT IN HER OWN VOICE IS A VERY IN HER OWN VOICE IS A VERY POWERFUL AND DIRECT DESCRIPTION POWERFUL AND DIRECT DESCRIPTION OF HER SIDE OF EVENTS. OF HER SIDE OF EVENTS. >> IT’S ALSO THE CASE THAT I >> IT’S ALSO THE CASE THAT I MEAN THIS IS PART OF THE ISSUE MEAN THIS IS PART OF THE ISSUE FOR THE PRESIDENT IN DENYING FOR THE PRESIDENT IN DENYING THIS, IS THAT THERE ARE OTHER THIS, IS THAT THERE ARE OTHER WOMEN WHO HAVE ACCUSED HIM OF WOMEN WHO HAVE ACCUSED HIM OF DOING THINGS SOMEWHAT SIMILARLY.

DOING THINGS SOMEWHAT SIMILARLY. NOTHING QUITE AS BAD AND VIOLENT NOTHING QUITE AS BAD AND VIOLENT AS THIS. AS THIS. BUT ALSO HE HAS TALKED ABOUT BUT ALSO HE HAS TALKED ABOUT DOING THINGS LIKE THIS, GRABBING DOING THINGS LIKE THIS, GRABBING THEM BY THE PRIVATES, WHICH IS THEM BY THE PRIVATES, WHICH IS WHAT SHE DESCRIBES. WHAT SHE DESCRIBES. I JUST START KISSING THEM. I JUST START KISSING THEM. THAT’S THE FAMOUS LINE FROM THAT’S THE FAMOUS LINE FROM “ACCESS HOLLYWOOD.” “ACCESS HOLLYWOOD.” IT BECOMES DIFFICULT FOR HIM TO IT BECOMES DIFFICULT FOR HIM TO DENY IT WHEN THOSE TWO THINGS DENY IT WHEN THOSE TWO THINGS ARE THERE.

ARE THERE. >> ABSOLUTELY. >> ABSOLUTELY. AND WHEN SHE HAS ONE OF THE AND WHEN SHE HAS ONE OF THE THINGS THAT PROSECUTORS LOOK FOR THINGS THAT PROSECUTORS LOOK FOR WHEN THERE’S AN ABSENCE OF WHEN THERE’S AN ABSENCE OF PHYSICAL EVIDENCE IN TERMS OF PHYSICAL EVIDENCE IN TERMS OF DEMONSTRATING CREDIBILITY IS THE DEMONSTRATING CREDIBILITY IS THE FACT THAT SHE TOLD PEOPLE AT THE FACT THAT SHE TOLD PEOPLE AT THE TIME. TIME. NOT THAT YOU SHOULD CONSIDER NOT THAT YOU SHOULD CONSIDER SOMEONE NOT CREDIBLE IF THEY SOMEONE NOT CREDIBLE IF THEY DIDN’T, BECAUSE A LOT OF PEOPLE DIDN’T, BECAUSE A LOT OF PEOPLE KEEP WHAT HAPPENS TO THEM SECRET KEEP WHAT HAPPENS TO THEM SECRET FOR DEEPLY PSYCHOLOGICAL REASONS FOR DEEPLY PSYCHOLOGICAL REASONS BECAUSE IT’S TRAUMATIC. BECAUSE IT’S TRAUMATIC. BUT THE FACT THAT THERE ARE BUT THE FACT THAT THERE ARE PEOPLE SHE TOLD AT THE TIME. PEOPLE SHE TOLD AT THE TIME. IF YOU REMEMBER, JUSTICE IF YOU REMEMBER, JUSTICE KAVANAUGH’S CONFIRMATION KAVANAUGH’S CONFIRMATION HEARINGS WAS ONE OF THE ISSUES HEARINGS WAS ONE OF THE ISSUES IN THE FORD CASE IN TERMS OF IN THE FORD CASE IN TERMS OF LOOKING FOR PEOPLE WHO SHE TOLD LOOKING FOR PEOPLE WHO SHE TOLD CONTEMPORANEOUSLY.

CONTEMPORANEOUSLY. >> AND SHE HAD NOT. >> AND SHE HAD NOT. >> SHE HAD NOT. >> SHE HAD NOT. IT HAD BEEN A PERIOD OF YEARS, IT HAD BEEN A PERIOD OF YEARS, WHICH I SAID IS NOT UNCOMMON AT WHICH I SAID IS NOT UNCOMMON AT ALL. ALL. BUT IN THIS TIME YOU HAVE BUT IN THIS TIME YOU HAVE CONTEMPORANEOUS DISCUSSIONS. CONTEMPORANEOUS DISCUSSIONS. >> SHE SAID I TOLD TWO CLOSE >> SHE SAID I TOLD TWO CLOSE FRIENDS. FRIENDS. A JOURNALIST, MAGAZINE WRITER, A JOURNALIST, MAGAZINE WRITER, CORRESPONDENT ON THE TV SHOWS, CORRESPONDENT ON THE TV SHOWS, BEGGED ME TO GO TO THE POLICE.

BEGGED ME TO GO TO THE POLICE. THE OTHER WAS A NEW YORK THE OTHER WAS A NEW YORK ANCHORWOMAN WHICH I THOUGHT IT ANCHORWOMAN WHICH I THOUGHT IT WAS INTERESTING IN THAMES OF HER WAS INTERESTING IN THAMES OF HER PRESENTING THE SOCIAL CAPITAL PRESENTING THE SOCIAL CAPITAL AND CREDIBILITY OF THE AND CREDIBILITY OF THE CONTEMPORANEOUS WITNESSES. CONTEMPORANEOUS WITNESSES. >> THAT’S RIGHT. >> THAT’S RIGHT. APPEARED THE CONTEMPORANEOUS APPEARED THE CONTEMPORANEOUS WITNESSES CAN TALK ABOUT HER WITNESSES CAN TALK ABOUT HER STATE OF MIND. STATE OF MIND. WHEN YOU’RE TALKING ABOUT AND WHEN YOU’RE TALKING ABOUT AND THE WAY SHE RECOUNTS, SHE’S A THE WAY SHE RECOUNTS, SHE’S A WRITER.

WRITER. SHE’S A VERY TALENTED WRITER BY SHE’S A VERY TALENTED WRITER BY THE WAY THIS IS WRITTEN, THAT THE WAY THIS IS WRITTEN, THAT SHE CAN RECOUNT IT IN A WAY SHE CAN RECOUNT IT IN A WAY THAT’S VERY DIRECT. THAT’S VERY DIRECT. AND IN SOME RESPECTS CLINICAL, AND IN SOME RESPECTS CLINICAL, RIGHT? RIGHT? AND THAT CAN BE USED — THAT’S AND THAT CAN BE USED — THAT’S SOMETHING THAT SOMETIMES PEOPLE SOMETHING THAT SOMETIMES PEOPLE USE AGAINST SOMEONE WHO HAS BEEN USE AGAINST SOMEONE WHO HAS BEEN THE VICTIM OF A CRIME IS IF THEY THE VICTIM OF A CRIME IS IF THEY ARE NOT EMOTING.

ARE NOT EMOTING. BUT IF YOU TOLD SOMEONE BUT IF YOU TOLD SOMEONE CONTEMPORANEOUSLY, THEN THAT CONTEMPORANEOUSLY, THEN THAT PERSON BECOMES A WITNESS TO YOUR PERSON BECOMES A WITNESS TO YOUR STATE OF MIND. STATE OF MIND. >> THERE’S ALSO THE FACT, WHAT’S >> THERE’S ALSO THE FACT, WHAT’S REMARKABLE TO ME IS THIS IS THE REMARKABLE TO ME IS THIS IS THE YEAR 2019. YEAR 2019. THE PRESIDENT HAS STARTED THE PRESIDENT HAS STARTED RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT FOUR YEARS RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT FOUR YEARS AGO AND THERE WAS AN AVALANCHE AGO AND THERE WAS AN AVALANCHE OF ACCUSATIONS AGAINST HIM ON OF ACCUSATIONS AGAINST HIM ON THE RECORD BY WOMEN, MANY OF THE RECORD BY WOMEN, MANY OF WHOM ALSO TOLD PEOPLE WHOM ALSO TOLD PEOPLE CONTEMPORANEOUSLY AT THE TIME.

CONTEMPORANEOUSLY AT THE TIME. >> SOME OF WHOM HAVE SUED HIM. >> SOME OF WHOM HAVE SUED HIM. >> SOME OF WHOM HAVE SUED HIM. >> SOME OF WHOM HAVE SUED HIM. SUMMER ZERVOS FOR DEFAMATION SUMMER ZERVOS FOR DEFAMATION WHEN HE CALLED HER A LIAR. WHEN HE CALLED HER A LIAR. THIS IS A NEW ACCUSATION AND IN THIS IS A NEW ACCUSATION AND IN SOME WAYS THE MOST SERIOUS YET. SOME WAYS THE MOST SERIOUS YET. >> YEAH. >> YEAH. I THINK ONE OF THE THINGS — I THINK ONE OF THE THINGS — ONE, I WILL SAY WE DON’T YET ONE, I WILL SAY WE DON’T YET KNOW WHAT HAPPENED. KNOW WHAT HAPPENED. WE DO KNOW THAT SHE HAS SOME WE DO KNOW THAT SHE HAS SOME CORROBORATION. CORROBORATION. WE KNOW THE PRESIDENT HAS DENIED WE KNOW THE PRESIDENT HAS DENIED IT. IT. BUT TO YOUR POINT, WHEN YOU HAVE BUT TO YOUR POINT, WHEN YOU HAVE A PATTERN OF BEHAVIOR, BECAUSE A PATTERN OF BEHAVIOR, BECAUSE HE CERTAINLY ALSO HAS A PATTERN HE CERTAINLY ALSO HAS A PATTERN OF WOMANIZING.

OF WOMANIZING. I WOULD SAY THAT IS IN THE I WOULD SAY THAT IS IN THE PUBLIC RECORD. PUBLIC RECORD. >> THAT’S I THINK SELF-ADMITTED. >> THAT’S I THINK SELF-ADMITTED. >> SELF-ADMITTED. >> SELF-ADMITTED. HE HAS SAID IN THE PUBLIC HE HAS SAID IN THE PUBLIC RECORD, DENY, DENY, DENY AND RECORD, DENY, DENY, DENY AND BECOME AGGRESSIVE IN THE FACE OF BECOME AGGRESSIVE IN THE FACE OF ACCUSATION IN ORDER TO GET OUT ACCUSATION IN ORDER TO GET OUT FROM UNDER IT. FROM UNDER IT. SO WHAT THAT TELLS US IS THE SO WHAT THAT TELLS US IS THE FACT OF HIS DENIAL IS NOT FACT OF HIS DENIAL IS NOT SUFFICIENT EITHER. SUFFICIENT EITHER. BUT I THINK THE QUESTION HERE, I BUT I THINK THE QUESTION HERE, I HAVE TO SAY, NEW YORK STATE NO HAVE TO SAY, NEW YORK STATE NO LONGER HAS A STATUTE OF LONGER HAS A STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS ON FIRST-DEGREE LIMITATIONS ON FIRST-DEGREE RAPE. RAPE. THAT DOESN’T MEAN THAT IN THIS THAT DOESN’T MEAN THAT IN THIS CASE SHE IS NECESSARILY SAYING CASE SHE IS NECESSARILY SAYING SHE WOULD BRING A RAPE CHARGE, SHE WOULD BRING A RAPE CHARGE, BUT THIS WOULD BE A FIRST — BUT THIS WOULD BE A FIRST — FROM WHAT I UNDERSTAND OF THE FROM WHAT I UNDERSTAND OF THE FACTS, THIS WAS POTENTIALLY A FACTS, THIS WAS POTENTIALLY A FIRST-DEGREE RAPE CASE WHICH FIRST-DEGREE RAPE CASE WHICH DOESN’T HAVE A STATUTE OF DOESN’T HAVE A STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS AND SHE HAS THE LIMITATIONS AND SHE HAS THE COAT.

COAT. SO THE OTHER QUESTION I HAD IS SO THE OTHER QUESTION I HAD IS DID SHE GET IT DRY CLEANED OR DID SHE GET IT DRY CLEANED OR NOT? NOT? AND IF — AND IF — >> THERE’S ALSO THE FACT THAT IN >> THERE’S ALSO THE FACT THAT IN THE CASE OF SUMMER ZERVOS WHO THE CASE OF SUMMER ZERVOS WHO YOU MENTIONED, SHE HAS A LAWSUIT YOU MENTIONED, SHE HAS A LAWSUIT THAT WILL GO FORWARD AS OF NOW. THAT WILL GO FORWARD AS OF NOW. ETS SET ETS SET IT’S SET TO GO FORWARD IN WHICH IT’S SET TO GO FORWARD IN WHICH A COURT OF LAW SHE IS SUING HIM A COURT OF LAW SHE IS SUING HIM FOR DEFAMATION BECAUSE HE CALLED FOR DEFAMATION BECAUSE HE CALLED HER A LIAR SO WHAT WITH IT BE HER A LIAR SO WHAT WITH IT BE LITIGATED ARE THE UNDERLYING LITIGATED ARE THE UNDERLYING FACTS.

FACTS. >> AND THE PRESIDENT CAN BE >> AND THE PRESIDENT CAN BE DEPOSED. DEPOSED. ALL OF THIS CONVERSATION THAT WE ALL OF THIS CONVERSATION THAT WE HAVE HAD IN THE ROBERT MUELLER HAVE HAD IN THE ROBERT MUELLER SPECIAL COUNSEL INVESTIGATION SPECIAL COUNSEL INVESTIGATION DOES NOT APPLY TO STATE LAW, IT DOES NOT APPLY TO STATE LAW, IT DOES NOT APPLY TO CIVIL ACTIONS. DOES NOT APPLY TO CIVIL ACTIONS. THE OTHER QUESTION IS WHETHER WE .

As found on Youtube

GET PAID FOR YOUR OPINIONS